Details
 

January 26, 2024

High School Mock Trial - District Competition

In-Person

 

The 2024 High School Mock Trial District Competition will take place on January 26, 2024, at various courthouses throughout the state of Ohio. Click HERE for more information.

In the case State of Buckeye v. Ash Espinosa, students will examine the history and application of the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment. Specifically, this case looks at excessive fines in the context of property forfeiture resulting from a crime. The defendant, Ash Espinosa, has pled guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering. The State is now looking to recover the loss of the conspiracy by seizing Espinosa’s 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. However, Espinosa argues against the Camaro’s seizure for two reasons: 1) Espinosa asserts that the State has seized more property and funds than what Espinosa owes and 2) Espinosa argues that, even if the Court determines that Espinosa is responsible for the remaining loss, seizure of the Camaro would violate Espinosa’s Eighth Amendment right against excessive fines.

For any inquiries or clarifications, please contact Danielle Wilmot (dwilmot@oclre.org) or call (614) 485-3507.

 

Printer-Friendly Version


Add to Calendar aCLuDhaqizCaPxAftmqF167204 01/26/2024 01/26/2024 true America/New_York High School Mock Trial - District Competition   The 2024 High School Mock Trial District Competition will take place on January 26, 2024, at various courthouses throughout the state of Ohio. Click HERE for more information. In the case State of Buckeye v. Ash Espinosa, students will examine the history and application of the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment. Specifically, this case looks at excessive fines in the context of property forfeiture resulting from a crime. The defendant, Ash Espinosa, has pled guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering. The State is now looking to recover the loss of the conspiracy by seizing Espinosa’s 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. However, Espinosa argues against the Camaro’s seizure for two reasons: 1) Espinosa asserts that the State has seized more property and funds than what Espinosa owes and 2) Espinosa argues that, even if the Court determines that Espinosa is responsible for the remaining loss, seizure of the Camaro would violate Espinosa’s Eighth Amendment right against excessive fines. For any inquiries or clarifications, please contact Danielle Wilmot (dwilmot@oclre.org) or call (614) 485-3507.   In-Person